Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
×



Details

Submitted on
April 29, 2007
Image Size
57.2 KB
Resolution
567×375
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
179
Favourites
1 (who?)
Comments
14
Downloads
3

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.
×
Tattoo by CaptainOscillator Tattoo by CaptainOscillator
Last one for the night, this is the tattoo design that I came up with for my sister shortly after she moved back down to be closer to home. Nikaila is the name of her daughter and my niece. There is no cuter baby on earth. Well, there wasn't, she's a toddler now. There is no cuter toddler on earth. Sorry folks, but this design is not for public use. Designed for my sister, so for my sister it stays. My apologies to the hordes of people out there just waiting to pounce on my stuff. :D

No touchy touchy. You want to use my stuff then try the rest of my gallery.
Add a Comment:
 
:icongomez389:
gomez389 Featured By Owner Aug 9, 2007
wow i really like it. its pretty. its gonna look so awsome. oh and by the way i just want to say that you and this atpeace person have the most interesting conversations. they are really intertaining.
Reply
:iconcarnivalchild:
CarnivalChild Featured By Owner Sep 1, 2007
sorry it took me so long to reply to your message, since I don't use this account anymore. I've shifted from captainO to the one I'm using now to type this reply. and atpeace and I have been having more "entertaining" conversations. (hint: not so fun if you're the one dealing with her)
Reply
:icongomez389:
gomez389 Featured By Owner Oct 12, 2007
oh wow. I really do need to get on more than once every other month. and i spelled entertaining wrong. thats really sad. "Bad TY". And may I just say that you have the best little comment thingies.
Reply
:iconatpeace:
atpeace Featured By Owner Apr 29, 2007
Why is every baby the cutest in the world?
Reply
:iconcaptainoscillator:
CaptainOscillator Featured By Owner Apr 30, 2007
because of blatant prejudice. although on the mother's part it's probably something to do with the evolutionary need for the mother to want to protect the child and bond with it.
Reply
:iconatpeace:
atpeace Featured By Owner May 1, 2007
Not necessarily evolutionary. Has nothing to do with natural selection etc AT ALL. It's about preservation of the human race. Not Darwinist. Not.
Reply
:iconcaptainoscillator:
CaptainOscillator Featured By Owner May 1, 2007
parents who have the care for their offspring mechanism wired into their brain are going to last longer than the wander off and party instinct.
Reply
:iconatpeace:
atpeace Featured By Owner May 2, 2007
Rubbish. If they wanted to make the race ADVANCE, which is what Darwnism is ABOUT, NOT just basic preservation, they would be objective and value the smart/strong/pretty kids.
Reply
:iconcaptainoscillator:
CaptainOscillator Featured By Owner May 2, 2007
Darwinism is about surviving and adapting to the environment, not intentionally selective breeding. valuing the smart and pretty is useless, under darwinism it's the strong who survive.
Reply
:iconatpeace:
atpeace Featured By Owner May 5, 2007
What do you think natural SELECTION is about?
It's the fittest - that includes those who will make the race advance... like... the smart.
Reply
Add a Comment: